graphslice · naming · mcp · csharp
Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net (or, how GraphSlice got its name)
Naming a company is the worst part of starting one. Ask Homer Simpson, who got as far as Interslice before losing his nerve and going with Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net...
On this page
Every company starts with a blank page and a problem worse than the product: what do we call this thing? When Homer Simpson sat at his dining-room table — which was also, for the length of one episode, his company's global headquarters — and worked the exact problem we did, he wanted a name that sounded like the future. He tried CutCo. He tried EdgeCom. And then, for one shining beat, he landed on Interslice.
We are not the first people to reach for slice. We are, we'd like to think, the first with a good reason.
We're actually in the slicing business
Nobody in that episode, not Homer, not Marge, not Bill Gates himself, could ever say what Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net did. That was the whole joke: pure 1998 internet vaporware, headquartered in a dining room, selling nothing but air and momentum.
We can name what we're selling in one sentence. GraphSlice serves context slices : the minimal connected subgraph of your codebase that answers one question about the code, and nothing else.
The -slice in our name isn't a suffix we bolted on because it sounded provocative. It is
the product. When an AI assistant asks "who calls this method?" or "what breaks
if I change this interface?", we don't hand it your repository and hope. We walk
the graph, cut out the exact subgraph that answers the question, and serve that.
A slice. The name is the spec.
And the graph- half is every bit as literal. Underneath is a
Roslyn-grade semantic graph of your C#
solution. Real types, methods, references, and call edges resolved by the
compiler. Not a bag of text that happens to sit near your cursor. Homer never
could explain his company. Ours is two nouns, and both of them are true.
The part where Bill Gates trashes the office
You know how the episode ends. Gates turns up at Evergreen Terrace, cheerfully admits he can't figure out what the company does, and offers to buy Homer out. Homer accepts gleefully but then comes the line:
"Oh, I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks." — Buy 'em out, boys!
And his men take the dining room apart.
It's one of the sharpest cold jabs at 1990s Microsoft ever put on television: the OS-giant who doesn't so much compete with the little guy as disassemble him, then bills it as an acquisition.
Why Microsoft would get it — and why we'd play along
Which is exactly why the joke is safe for us to make. Point that scene at GraphSlice and it stops being a threat and turns into a wink, because everything we build sits on Microsoft's stack, not across the table from it:
- The graph is Roslyn's. We read your solution with the same compiler platform Microsoft ships. Our fidelity is their fidelity, and every C# feature they add is one we understand for free the day it lands.
- The language is theirs. GraphSlice exists to make C# and .NET legible to AI agents. The better an agent can reason about a million-line .NET codebase, the safer a bet it is to keep writing .NET at all in the AI era. We make Microsoft's languages age well.
- The protocol is the one they've adopted. We serve over the Model Context Protocol — the same MCP that VS Code, GitHub Copilot, and Azure now speak natively. Piping structural code context into that socket isn't slipping past the platform. It's walking in the front door they built and left open on purpose.
Add it up and the cartoon inverts. If Gates walked into our dining room, he wouldn't need the goons, he'd just get it. GraphSlice runs on-premise, our clients source never leaves their building while unlocking better LLM performance along the way. The entire point is to make the Microsoft ecosystem more valuable in the age of AI, not to carve a piece off it. (Well, one piece. Per question, per slice. That's our product.)
So we'll happily play the homage straight, TTS and all. A company that was genuinely afraid of Redmond couldn't afford this joke; we can, precisely because we know which side of the office-trashing we're on. We named ourselves after the one thing Homer never could explain and then we built it on the very stack the man with the checkbook would recognize on sight.
Homer, roll the tape.